Tag Archives: kellymchaleblog

Blog Update – What does Wisdom mean to you?

Hello All

I haven’t posted anything new to this blog in quite awhile.  There has been a lot going on in both my personal and professional life.  I have returned to working on my Master’s Thesis after having a six month break, while my thesis advisor was away on sabbatical.  It is a bit jarring to return to academic commitments after such a break but it is also enjoyable and challenging.  In the near future I may post my thesis topic to get some feedback.

I think that wisdom is a goal each of us aspires to in our lives.  Wisdom is ageless and timeless and attaining it is a process of growth and understanding.

“Where wisdom reigns, there is no conflict between thinking and feeling”  Carl Jung

Every time I read this quote, I wander off on a train of thought about what conflict between ‘thinking’ and ‘feeling’ really means.  Before we delve into this, I think I will provide a bit of background on Carl Jung.

Carl Jung was a pioneering depth psychologist, who was a contemporary, and early on, a close friend, follower and colleague of Sigmund Freud.  The two men went their separate ways after a fundamental and decisive disagreement regarding God and spirituality.  Freud was a staunch atheist while Jung was a deep thinker on the topic of God, spirituality, and how psychology and spirituality related to one another.  It was Jung who coined the term ‘collective unconsciousness’, which is his concept of how all beings share an unremembered field of mutually meaningful symbols, metaphors, history and spirituality.  While we are not consciously aware of these shared images and memories, Jung believed that they have an influence on our unconscious individual psyche and on our conscious emotional reactions and behaviours.

Jung also developed a theory on personality and different psychological types.  From this theory, Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers developed a personality inventory designed to orient people to their particular personality type.  This test is the well known Briggs-Myers Type Indicator or the MBTI.  Jung’s psychological types are all variations on four dimensions and four sub-categories.  Two of the dimensions are introversion and extraversion.  In Jung’s conception, these traits represent where we mainly get our energy from, each of us showing a preference for either being outward and around other people, or being inward and solitary.  The other two dimensions are about how we take in information from the world around us.  These dimensions are Perceiving, meaning just that, taking in information, perceiving things in the world around us.  The other dimension he called Judging, which he describes as organizing information we take in and coming to conclusions about it.  Jung basically believed that people have preferences for these dimensions and tend to either Perceive or Judge.  These ‘types’ are not black and white and most of us fall somewhere on a spectrum of each dimension, meaning we each have a dominant preference but we also experience the opposite in some measure.

The subcategories are two pairs of opposites, Sensing and Intuition, and Thinking and Feeling.  And so, this is where we get to the quote, “Where wisdom reigns, there is no conflict between thinking and feeling”.  Jung, in his psychological typology, described ‘thinking’ as being logical, analytical, using cause and effect reasoning, holding an objective standard of truth, being reasonable and wanting everyone to be treated equally.  In opposition to that, he defined ‘feeling’ as being empathetic, guided by personal values, considering the impact decisions have on others, being compassionate and wanting everyone to be treated as an individual.  Jung’s view of wisdom implies that these two ways of being in the world would have to come together harmoniously in the mind of one person.  How would it be possible to do this?

For me, it is difficult to imagine holding an objective standard of truth.  My belief system holds that there is no objective truth.  I see truth as an individual perception, coloured by the lens we view the world through, leaving each person’s truth as what is true for him or her.  This is probably the crux of the matter…the individual and the collective…every individual makes up the collective of humanity.  So, when we are able to completely accept our own and others’ subjective views, as part of the greater whole, we may experience a sense of wisdom?

When I first thought about this statement, I thought about my own feelings being in conflict with my own thinking.  Both my feelings and my thoughts are subjective, to me.  Are they in conflict?  Often.  Mostly because my thoughts are often criticizing and judging my feelings, rather than my thoughts observing my feelings without judgment.  Maybe this is more in line with the quote?  We humans, with our thoughts, are constantly judging our feelings, rather than accepting them.  When we accept our own feelings as part of who we are, we must, logically, find it easier to accept others without judgment.

I think maybe this sounds more like the path of wisdom to me.  The term ‘conflict’ fits the scenario of the voice in our heads constantly criticizing our feelings.  We all have negative and positive feelings and when we judge ourselves harshly, we also project that judgment outwards to judge others harshly as well.  The dark side of our emotions needs to be integrated as an acceptable part of who we are.  We do not have to act on negative feelings, we only have to observe and accept.

So, in the end, when we talk about wisdom according to Carl Jung, it seems that it includes peace within our own internal ‘conflict’ and peace with the external ‘conflict’ with others…the individual and the collective.

And how wise would we all be if we could do this for ourselves and others?

Peace

 

.

Relationships Can Be So Difficult…(Part 1)

One of the most common reasons for people to seek counselling is that they are having difficulty maintaining healthy and fulfilling relationships with others.  In this post I am going to be talking about couple relationships specifically and how the nature of the couple relationship is related to attachment style.  Although I am focusing on couple relationships in this post, the underlying theory on attachment applies to relationships with family and friends as well.  Couple relationships can be one of the most joyful and satisfying experiences in life but they can also be one of the most difficult and painful.  It is possible, through understanding, work and insight, to create the type of relationship that you desire, be it with a current partner or a potential partner.

‘Attachment style’ refers to how we relate to ourselves and our partners in the context of an intimate relationship.  It encompasses how we feel and think about ourselves, our partner and the interactions and patterns of communication that occur in the space between the two partners, in the relationship.   Attachment style develops in childhood and is based mainly on the type and quality of our early relationships with caregivers.  For many and varied reasons, it happens that sometimes, as vulnerable children, we do not feel safe, and the development of a secure attachment pattern is interrupted.

Attachment style can basically be broken down into two types, secure and  insecure.  There are several specific subcategories of insecure attachment but for the purpose of simplicity, I will just refer to secure or insecure attachment in this post.

A person with a secure attachment style generally holds a worldview that includes a basic trust of others. a belief that he or she is lovable and a sense of self that is stable and doesn’t shift and change depending on who one is with.  People who have a secure attachment style are able to understand and accept their own imperfections and those of their partner. This style of attachment allows people to understand that the world is not black and white, that there are gray areas and uncertainties and risks inherent in relationships.  This style allows one to fully engage emotionally in the relationship and contributes to deep intimacy, growth and fulfillment. The secure attachment style encompasses a self that can be trusted and relied upon to manage and survive should the relationship end.

Given the qualities of the secure attachment style, it follows that the insecure attachment style begins with a basic lack of trust in the self and others.  A person with an insecure attachment style questions, often outside of conscious awareness, their own value, judgment and worth.  If one doubts their own value, it follows that one would also question how someone else could actually, truly love them.  And when someone comes along who does love them, it is difficult to trust that this is true.  This underlying insecurity leads to constant doubt in the self, the partner and the relationship.  It leads to many behaviours and reactions that damage and erode the relationship and the cycle is self-perpetuating.   And to top that off, it is likely that people with insecure attachment styles are attracted to, and in a relationship with, partners who also have an insecure attachment style.

One pattern of relationship that results from insecure attachment styles is the one that is full of fear, manifesting in jealousy, suspicion, possessiveness and controlling behaviours.  The underlying mechanism here is a PRIMAL FEAR of abandonment.  The fear is intense and is difficult to disengage from.  Thoughts and fears around the partner and the relationship are pervasive and the resulting behaviours and reactions range from intense, fearful clinging to the partner to intense rage towards the partner and everything in between.  There is a wide spectrum of severity in these behaviours, from what would be perceived as flattering jealousy or possessiveness, at one end, to severe restrictive behaviours at the other, such as one partner not allowing the other to leave the home.

We need now to touch on the subject of perception.  How we perceive ourselves, other people and relationships is unique and subjective.  Our own, individual perceptions are coloured by our past experiences and belief systems.  So, each person has a unique pair of glasses, or lenses, through which they view the world.  If we put on a pair of glasses that have tinted pink lenses, what we see will be pink objects in the world.  Our perception of ourselves and others is coloured by the collection of emotional experiences we have had from birth onwards.  When we are very young, and before we really have language skills, experiences are stored in consciousness as emotional impressions and reactions.  When young children experience the fear of being alone, rejected or abandoned, it is a PRIMAL FEAR that feels like a threat to their life and existence.  They will adapt their behaviour in many ways in order to get their needs met and feel some sense of security.  When we grow up, these patterns, fears and reactions are buried deeply in our subconscious.  We interpret and react, as adults, through our individual collection of experiences, in other words, through our unique lens.

I am going to end this post here.  This is a ton of information to take in and think about.  If you are interested in this topic, it would be useful and helpful to take some time to journal or think about what type of attachment style you think you have and about what events and situations may have coloured how you perceive the world.

I will post Part 2 in the next week and will give some concrete examples of how relationships develop and what reactions are triggered when there is an insecure attachment style.

Please feel free to comment on this post, including letting me know if it is logical and understandable, or too theoretical, or any other thoughts you might have about it.

Kelly

What Is the Difference Between Therapy and Counselling?

Hi and welcome to my first blog post!  I am really looking forward to connecting and communicating with my current clients, former clients, potential clients and anyone else who is interested in reading about, and discussing, various topics in the often overlapping fields of psychology and spirituality.  I welcome any and all comments and suggestions and have no problem discussing controversial subject matter, sexual topics and issues or whatever far flung material we can come up with.  I would be unlikely to publish any disrespectful comments, opinions can always be stated with respect and all opinions are welcome.  So…

So, what is the difference between therapy and counselling?

There are many metaphors that could be used to describe the difference between the two, but the one I like best would describe therapy as the tearing down and rebuilding of the unstable foundations of a house while counselling might be seen as a repair and maintenance task, such as fixing a broken window, repairing a worn roof or applying a new coat of paint.

Therapy is a longer process than counselling and addresses deep rooted issues that usually stem from childhood or family history or trauma.  These types of issues usually affect one’s ability to sustain healthy and satisfying relationships with intimate partners, family members and friends and often manifest in symptoms of depression, anxiety, addiction or many other mental health difficulties.  These issues can affect and inhibit one’s ability to enjoy life and to experience personal growth and the reaching of one’s greatest potential.

Counselling is more likely to be a shorter, time limited process that is specifically focused on addressing and remedying one or two particular issues.  These issues may be life changes, such as loss or divorce, career changes, behaviour specific changes, such as overcoming fears and phobias, addressing addictive behaviours or managing relationships.

Therapy and counselling are likely to use different theoretical approaches and mechanisms to effect change.  Therapy, also known as psychotherapy, is much more likely to make use of depth psychology approaches such as psychodynamic therapy, Jungian psychology or attachment based theory, to name but a few.  Counselling is often associated with more thought and behaviourally focused methods such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy or one or more of its many offshoots.  Each approach has pros and cons, of course, and most therapists likely draw on many facets and philosophies from different theoretical approaches.

The important point here is that each person and each situation is entirely unique while remaining under the umbrella of universality.  As the Thai people would say “Same, same only different”.  Therapist and client will decide and discover together what is the most appropriate and helpful course for the individual circumstances and the unique human beings involved.

Here in Canada, you should be aware that when you see the term ‘Counselling’, it could encompass either therapy or counselling, or both, and it is the most widely recognized term in the field.  In Scotland and Ireland, in contrast, the distinction is often made on the website or in information literature and clients can request either/or.  The reasons for these geographical differences are the subject of another blog!

If you’ve gotten this far in reading, please feel free to disagree, comment, ask questions or suggest any other topic you are interested in discussing.

Peace and warm wishes

Kelly